Employers prepare for bus strike chaos

Wake Smith Solicitors 09 October 2009

Further disruption is expected across South Yorkshire over the coming month as bus drivers once again threaten to strike over an ongoing pay dispute, potentially costing the Sheffield economy hundreds of thousands of pounds. There will be further disruption to the region's businesses as employees struggle to get to work, either on time or at all.

Mark Serby, partner and head of the Employment team at Wake Smith & Tofields, says employers will quickly need to review and implement their absence management policies and make it clear what happens if and when an employee doesn't come in to work.

The Unite union has said First Group drivers across South Yorkshire will walk out on 12, 19 and 26 October 2009. An additional three-day strike will also be held by drivers in Sheffield from Thursday 15 to Saturday 17 October 2009.

From an employment law point of view, the starting point is always the basic premise that employees are entitled to be paid wages for the work they have done. It therefore stands that if an employee does not attend work to carry out the work he or she is employed to do, then the employer is not obliged to pay the employee.

There are of course exceptions to this. Sickness is an obvious one. But there are also statutory allowances permitting time off to care for dependents in emergencies. In the present scenario, this might extend to taking time off to care for a child who is unable to get to school because of the strike action and no other care can be organised for that child. However, there has been good advance warning of the threat of strikes and it may not be deemed an emergency where forward planning could have relieved the situation.

Employers should also look to their contracts of employment which may deal with situations where an employee is unable to attend work because of circumstances outside of their control. Further, it might be that the Company has in the past exercised discretion and paid employees who have been unable to attend work because of transport issues, or even during the Sheffield floods in 2007. Once discretion has been exercised by an employer it is difficult to go back from that position and care should be taken, even if it was only offered as a goodwill gesture.

It may be that you offer to allow employees to take time off as holiday during any period of strike action, or alternatively authorise a day of unpaid absence. This can be discussed with the employees who are affected in smaller organisations, but care should again be exercised when offering this generally across the workforce. Alternatively, an absence may be authorised on the basis that the time lost is made up over the course of the following week.

An employer might also consider the possibility of home working, which is easier to facilitate for office workers who might be able to work within the Company's systems, albeit remotely. It may again depend on contractual or policy provisions, but if the employee wants to work from home, the employer may be unreasonable in refusing to allow him or her to do so if the employee can deliver work from home.

As with most employment issues, advance consideration and communication is key. By setting out firm policies and practice prior to the anticipated disruption further complications down the line can be avoided. This will present a saving in both time and money when businesses can ill afford to lose out on either.

For more information and advice on the legal issues surrounding work absence please contact the Employment team at Wake Smith on 0114 266 6660 or email [email protected].

Tags

Archive

November 20242October 20246September 20245August 20245July 20243June 20243May 20245April 20242March 20247February 20242January 20248December 20236November 20232October 20233September 20232August 20234July 20232June 20235May 20237March 20234February 20235January 20233December 20225November 20224October 20224September 20223June 20221May 20227April 20223March 20223February 20223January 20224December 20214November 20213October 20214September 20216August 20212July 202111June 20218May 20216April 20212March 20218February 20218January 20219December 20208November 202013October 20208September 20208August 20203July 20208June 202016May 202011April 20206March 202016February 20208January 202011December 20199November 20199October 201911September 20195August 20194July 20196May 20198April 20196March 20193February 20195January 20194December 20186November 20185October 20182September 20185August 20184July 20189June 20184May 201810April 20185March 20184February 20184January 20183December 20175November 20178October 20177September 20179August 20175July 20176June 201710May 20175April 20178March 201711February 20176January 201710December 20169November 20167October 201610September 201610August 20166July 20167June 20163May 20162April 20166March 20162February 20164January 20165December 20153November 20155October 20156September 20156August 20157July 20157June 20157May 20156April 20159March 20156February 201510January 20156December 20145November 20144October 20142September 20143May 20144March 20146February 20144January 20142December 20132November 20133September 20134July 20132June 20132May 20133April 20131March 20133February 20133January 20136December 20121November 20123October 20122August 20122July 20128June 20123April 20123March 20121January 20124December 20112November 20111October 20112September 20113August 20113July 20117June 20119May 20117April 20115March 20119February 20118January 20111December 20101October 20102September 20102August 20103July 20106June 20101May 20102April 20106March 20102February 20103January 20102December 20095November 20092October 20092September 20092August 20091July 20095June 20095May 20093April 20093March 20093February 20091January 20092November 20082October 20082September 20081August 20083July 20081January 20082

Featured Articles

Contact us