Allowing legal representation in employment disciplinary hearings - What employers need to know

Wake Smith Solicitors 17 December 2009

For some years (since the Employment Relations Act 1999) all employers have ensured that employees are provided with their statutory rights to be accompanied by a trade union representative or fellow worker at any disciplinary hearing.

Some employees ask for a legal representative in disciplinary proceedings. Two cases in 2009 explored whether there might be a breach of the European Convention of Human Rights (ECHR) if this was denied:

  • The first case concerned a provisional listing on the Protection of Vulnerable Adults (POVA) list in relation to a care home (Wright v the Secretary of State for Health)

  • The second case concerned the Education Act 2002 and Regulations thereunder (R(G) v The Governors of X School and Y City Council (2009)).

For employment lawyers, however, the key case has been Kulkarnie v Milton Keynes Hospital NHS Foundation (2009).

Very briefly, Dr K was suspended pending investigation when a patient made a complaint that he placed a stethoscope under her knickers without her consent. A CRB check revealed that in previous employment he had been prosecuted for an offence of sexual assault on a patient and had been acquitted after trial. The Trust employer was asked to exercise discretion to allow legal representation at the disciplinary stage in view of the complexity and potential seriousness of the case.

Much of the Court of Appeal decision concentrated on various contractual issues and interpretation of the contractual rights between Dr K and the Trust. However, although not central to the decision in this particular case the ECHR was considered and the Court pointed out that wherever an employer receives a request for the employee to be legally represented he should consider the request fairly and rationally where the outcome of a denial of full rights of representation might be a breach of ECHR.

Are you affected?

Not only doctors are affected by the decision. Taking into account the three decisions and the trend of the Courts together this line of reasoning is likely to be applied to all professional people working in the public sector whose future career may be affected by particular changes in a disciplinary hearing. The decision is of crucial importance to, for example, teachers; those working in the caring profession including those employed in care homes and those working in the financial and legal services sector. Any employer who is effectively a near monopoly employer or where the sector is very restricted should seriously consider allowing legal representation if it is requested in the case of a disciplinary hearing of some substance.

For more information on this or any related topic please contact Holly Dobson on 0114 266 6660 or email [email protected].

Tags

Archive

November 20242October 20246September 20245August 20245July 20243June 20243May 20245April 20242March 20247February 20242January 20248December 20236November 20232October 20233September 20232August 20234July 20232June 20235May 20237March 20234February 20235January 20233December 20225November 20224October 20224September 20223June 20221May 20227April 20223March 20223February 20223January 20224December 20214November 20213October 20214September 20216August 20212July 202111June 20218May 20216April 20212March 20218February 20218January 20219December 20208November 202013October 20208September 20208August 20203July 20208June 202016May 202011April 20206March 202016February 20208January 202011December 20199November 20199October 201911September 20195August 20194July 20196May 20198April 20196March 20193February 20195January 20194December 20186November 20185October 20182September 20185August 20184July 20189June 20184May 201810April 20185March 20184February 20184January 20183December 20175November 20178October 20177September 20179August 20175July 20176June 201710May 20175April 20178March 201711February 20176January 201710December 20169November 20167October 201610September 201610August 20166July 20167June 20163May 20162April 20166March 20162February 20164January 20165December 20153November 20155October 20156September 20156August 20157July 20157June 20157May 20156April 20159March 20156February 201510January 20156December 20145November 20144October 20142September 20143May 20144March 20146February 20144January 20142December 20132November 20133September 20134July 20132June 20132May 20133April 20131March 20133February 20133January 20136December 20121November 20123October 20122August 20122July 20128June 20123April 20123March 20121January 20124December 20112November 20111October 20112September 20113August 20113July 20117June 20119May 20117April 20115March 20119February 20118January 20111December 20101October 20102September 20102August 20103July 20106June 20101May 20102April 20106March 20102February 20103January 20102December 20095November 20092October 20092September 20092August 20091July 20095June 20095May 20093April 20093March 20093February 20091January 20092November 20082October 20082September 20081August 20083July 20081January 20082

Featured Articles

Contact us