Supreme Court decision means reduced access to justice, warns Sheffield solicitors

Wake Smith Solicitors 13 April 2011

Leading Sheffield law firm Wake Smith & Tofields has warned that a judgment announced today by the Supreme Court may lead to reduced access to justice for many who suffer preventable injuries at work. The comments were made in response to the reversal of a decision by the Supreme Court in connection to the landmark case of Stephanie Baker, who in 2009, made legal history after a ruling at the Court of Appeal agreed her employer, knitting company Quantum Clothing Group, should have done more to protect her hearing.

Stephanie Baker, 51, was awarded £3,500 compensation by the Court of Appeal when her solicitors Wake Smith & Tofields successfully argued that the average employer should have known that noise levels of 85 decibels was not safe and should have provided hearing protection to workers after 1978.

The Supreme Court has now reversed this decision in what many believe will be seen as a good day for the Insurance industry.

Terry Regan, Head of Personal Injury and Medical Negligence at Wake Smith & Tofields said, "This is a surprising decision from the highest court and I am sorry for Ms Baker that she has not ultimately been successful in her brave fight to prove that her employers could have done more to prevent hearing damage. Five Justices heard the evidence in this case and in a Judgment handed down today 2 found in favour of Ms Baker and 3 against. In fact out of the 9 judges who heard Ms Baker's case throughout this process, 5 senior judges actually agreed with her (3 judges in the Court of Appeal agreed unanimously).

"This decision comes against a background of the Government announcing that claims for injuries at work are straightforward, can be pursued at low cost and with proposals that the injured claimant should pay towards the legal costs. Ms Baker's case, with the wide range of views from the country's leading judges, demonstrates how difficult these cases can be for both sides to assess. The Supreme Court on first sight has closed the door on a significant number of workers who have been injured at work. However, no worker who suffers a preventable injury should be deterred from the opportunity to pursue their case. The key is to get advice from experienced solicitors who can help to advise on the particulars of your case."

Martin Harvey, partner at Wake Smith & Tofields added: "We would also ask the Government not to add to the difficulties thrown up by Ms Baker's case and to level the playing field to allow workers the opportunity to pursue meritorious cases in the future."

Anyone requiring legal advice regarding a potential claim regarding injuries sustained at work or otherwise, should call David Brown on 0114 266 6660 or email [email protected]

Tags

Archive

November 20242October 20246September 20245August 20245July 20243June 20243May 20245April 20242March 20247February 20242January 20248December 20236November 20232October 20233September 20232August 20234July 20232June 20235May 20237March 20234February 20235January 20233December 20225November 20224October 20224September 20223June 20221May 20227April 20223March 20223February 20223January 20224December 20214November 20213October 20214September 20216August 20212July 202111June 20218May 20216April 20212March 20218February 20218January 20219December 20208November 202013October 20208September 20208August 20203July 20208June 202016May 202011April 20206March 202016February 20208January 202011December 20199November 20199October 201911September 20195August 20194July 20196May 20198April 20196March 20193February 20195January 20194December 20186November 20185October 20182September 20185August 20184July 20189June 20184May 201810April 20185March 20184February 20184January 20183December 20175November 20178October 20177September 20179August 20175July 20176June 201710May 20175April 20178March 201711February 20176January 201710December 20169November 20167October 201610September 201610August 20166July 20167June 20163May 20162April 20166March 20162February 20164January 20165December 20153November 20155October 20156September 20156August 20157July 20157June 20157May 20156April 20159March 20156February 201510January 20156December 20145November 20144October 20142September 20143May 20144March 20146February 20144January 20142December 20132November 20133September 20134July 20132June 20132May 20133April 20131March 20133February 20133January 20136December 20121November 20123October 20122August 20122July 20128June 20123April 20123March 20121January 20124December 20112November 20111October 20112September 20113August 20113July 20117June 20119May 20117April 20115March 20119February 20118January 20111December 20101October 20102September 20102August 20103July 20106June 20101May 20102April 20106March 20102February 20103January 20102December 20095November 20092October 20092September 20092August 20091July 20095June 20095May 20093April 20093March 20093February 20091January 20092November 20082October 20082September 20081August 20083July 20081January 20082

Featured Articles

Contact us