Will The Government Implement Changes For A New IP Framework?

Wake Smith Solicitors 29 April 2012

Under pressure to remove obstructions to innovation and growth the Government commissioned Professor Ian Hargreaves in November 2010 to review the current intellectual property framework to determine whether it was fit for purpose. Peter Rawlinson, Partner and head of Wake Smith's IP/IT team agrees that the recommended overhaul of the IP framework must become a priority to aid economic growth in the region. Ahead of the Government's response to the Hargreaves Report, Peter reviews the core recommendations and their implications for the region. Hargreaves found that the UK's IP framework½"especially with regard to copyright, is falling behind what is needed½and the UK cannot afford to let a legal framework designed around artists impede vigorous participation in emerging business sectors." A diverse range of some 300 organisations representing consumers, content and technology providers, education and professional experts were consulted over a 5 month period. The Hargreaves Report made 10 recommendations:

  1. Evidence - the UK IP system should be driven as far as possible by objective empirical evidence diluting the effect of powerful lobbying groups as we saw with the Digital Economy Act.
  1. International Priorities - the UK should pursue its interest in IP in emerging economies and a unified EU patent court and EU patent system. The UK should work to make the Patent Cooperation Treaty a more effective vehicle for international processing of patent applications.
  1. Copyright licensing - establish a cross sectoral Digital Copyright Exchange by the end of 2012. The UK should support moves by the EC to establish a framework for cross border copyright licensing, with clear benefits to the UK as a major exporter of copyright works.
  1. Orphan Works - the Government should legislate to enable licensing of orphan works. A work should only be treated as an orphan if it cannot be found by searching the DCE database.
  1. Limits to Copyright - resist over regulation of activities which do not prejudice the central objective of copyright, namely the provision of incentives to creators. Government should deliver copyright exceptions to realise all the opportunities within the EU framework.
  1. Patent Thickets and Other Obstruction to Innovation - the Government should; take a leading role in promoting international efforts to cut backlogs and manage the boom in patent applications by further extending "work sharing" with patent offices in other countries.
  1. The Design Industry - this whole branch of the creative economy needs assessment with a view to establishing a firmer basis for evaluating policy at UK and European level.
  1. Enforcement of IP Rights - The Government should pursue an integrated approach to strengthen and grow legitimate markets in copyright and other IP protected fields.
  1. Small Firm Access to IP Advice - The IPO should draw up plans to improve accessibility by smaller companies of the IP system
  1. An IP System Responsive to Change - The IPO should be empowered to ensure the UK's IP system promotes innovation and growth through efficient, contestable markets.

Clients in this region working in the digital sector have responded positively to the concept of a Digital Copyright Exchange as it would potentially expedite the clearing rights process for content and safeguard against alleged breach of copyright. Hargreaves reports that SMEs "had most to gain from more accessible, transparent markets for rights½[as they are]..least equipped to cope with transaction costs and complexities". We've seen this on an increasing scale as securing the use of tracks or images for applications developed by clients can be time consuming and expensive. Equally, content providers from film, arts and the music sector are hostile to some of the recommendations in particular the concept that orphan works should be freely available if not registered on the DCE. Some clients are concerned this creates a burden of having to register all works (such as unused files of music, film and images) to avoid such being deemed orphan works. If such images are not registered on the DCE it could mean third parties who then claim to be unaware of the rights owner would be entitled to use such works without sanction. Contact  Wake Smith for more information 0114 266 66660.

Tags

Archive

November 20242October 20246September 20245August 20245July 20243June 20243May 20245April 20242March 20247February 20242January 20248December 20236November 20232October 20233September 20232August 20234July 20232June 20235May 20237March 20234February 20235January 20233December 20225November 20224October 20224September 20223June 20221May 20227April 20223March 20223February 20223January 20224December 20214November 20213October 20214September 20216August 20212July 202111June 20218May 20216April 20212March 20218February 20218January 20219December 20208November 202013October 20208September 20208August 20203July 20208June 202016May 202011April 20206March 202016February 20208January 202011December 20199November 20199October 201911September 20195August 20194July 20196May 20198April 20196March 20193February 20195January 20194December 20186November 20185October 20182September 20185August 20184July 20189June 20184May 201810April 20185March 20184February 20184January 20183December 20175November 20178October 20177September 20179August 20175July 20176June 201710May 20175April 20178March 201711February 20176January 201710December 20169November 20167October 201610September 201610August 20166July 20167June 20163May 20162April 20166March 20162February 20164January 20165December 20153November 20155October 20156September 20156August 20157July 20157June 20157May 20156April 20159March 20156February 201510January 20156December 20145November 20144October 20142September 20143May 20144March 20146February 20144January 20142December 20132November 20133September 20134July 20132June 20132May 20133April 20131March 20133February 20133January 20136December 20121November 20123October 20122August 20122July 20128June 20123April 20123March 20121January 20124December 20112November 20111October 20112September 20113August 20113July 20117June 20119May 20117April 20115March 20119February 20118January 20111December 20101October 20102September 20102August 20103July 20106June 20101May 20102April 20106March 20102February 20103January 20102December 20095November 20092October 20092September 20092August 20091July 20095June 20095May 20093April 20093March 20093February 20091January 20092November 20082October 20082September 20081August 20083July 20081January 20082

Featured Articles

Contact us