Divorce Form Error

Wake Smith Solicitors 15 December 2015

The newspapers have today been awash with various headlines such as "Divorce form error could have led to unfair settlements" and "Divorce software error to hit thousands of settlements".

The concern about such headlines is that it could lead to divorcees panicking or indeed raising false hopes about overturning the original financial settlement. The software relates to an online form which can be downloaded from the Ministry of Justice. Solicitors rarely use forms directly from the Ministry of Justice and certainly we at Wake Smith do not use the software which has caused today's headline. Where a divorcing couple have agreed a financial settlement, the form to which the software glitch applies, is not relevant. If a couple are not able to reach an agreement and issue Court proceedings to try and resolve their claims then they are required to fill in a lengthy form called a "Form E". The Form E requires the parties to set out in detail their income, expenditure, capital, liabilities and pension provision. The Form E is completed at the start of the process. The completed Form E will clearly show what each parties' capital amounts to and will clearly show what each parties' liabilities amount to; the software glitch is that the online form should automatically deduct the liabilities from the capital sum and calculate the net effect. It is unusual for solicitors to use the Ministry of Justice website to fill in Form E's and so the problem highlighted today will predominantly affect those parties who have represented themselves within the financial proceedings. As has already been mentioned, the Form E is completed at the start of the Court process and although there is a problem with the software, it nevertheless does not prevent the Judge clearly seeing on the Form E the value of the capital and later the amount of the liabilities. Whilst it has been estimated that over 20,000 cases may have been affected by the error in the software it would be very surprising if many divorce settlements will have to be revisited as a result of the error. Despite the anticipated low numbers of cases affected, nevertheless the Ministry of Justice will have to carry out a full investigation which will require judicial involvement. This is unwelcomed news during a time when the Courts are very much overworked, not least because of so many people representing themselves in person rather than through a specialist solicitor who would know what assets and liabilities should be taken into account relevant to the individual case in hand and will not rely on a generic formula from the Ministry of Justice. If you have any concerns about a financial divorce settlement which may have taken place after the issue of Court proceedings, please contact our specialist Family Law Department on 0114 266 6660 or [email protected].

Tags

Archive

November 20242October 20246September 20245August 20245July 20243June 20243May 20245April 20242March 20247February 20242January 20248December 20236November 20232October 20233September 20232August 20234July 20232June 20235May 20237March 20234February 20235January 20233December 20225November 20224October 20224September 20223June 20221May 20227April 20223March 20223February 20223January 20224December 20214November 20213October 20214September 20216August 20212July 202111June 20218May 20216April 20212March 20218February 20218January 20219December 20208November 202013October 20208September 20208August 20203July 20208June 202016May 202011April 20206March 202016February 20208January 202011December 20199November 20199October 201911September 20195August 20194July 20196May 20198April 20196March 20193February 20195January 20194December 20186November 20185October 20182September 20185August 20184July 20189June 20184May 201810April 20185March 20184February 20184January 20183December 20175November 20178October 20177September 20179August 20175July 20176June 201710May 20175April 20178March 201711February 20176January 201710December 20169November 20167October 201610September 201610August 20166July 20167June 20163May 20162April 20166March 20162February 20164January 20165December 20153November 20155October 20156September 20156August 20157July 20157June 20157May 20156April 20159March 20156February 201510January 20156December 20145November 20144October 20142September 20143May 20144March 20146February 20144January 20142December 20132November 20133September 20134July 20132June 20132May 20133April 20131March 20133February 20133January 20136December 20121November 20123October 20122August 20122July 20128June 20123April 20123March 20121January 20124December 20112November 20111October 20112September 20113August 20113July 20117June 20119May 20117April 20115March 20119February 20118January 20111December 20101October 20102September 20102August 20103July 20106June 20101May 20102April 20106March 20102February 20103January 20102December 20095November 20092October 20092September 20092August 20091July 20095June 20095May 20093April 20093March 20093February 20091January 20092November 20082October 20082September 20081August 20083July 20081January 20082

Featured Articles

Contact us