Disputes following a bereavement

Wake Smith Solicitors 08 March 2017

Every year, a growing number of people find themselves in a situation where there is a disagreement after someone has passed away about the deceased's estate.

Senior members of the team at Wake Smith, Nick Lambert and Stephen Thompson, have more than 30 years’ experience each dealing with cases in this area and are regularly consulted in relation to all manner of disputes arising after a bereavement.

Here Nick Lambert, chairman of Wake Smith and a specialist litigation solicitor looks at the main issues relating to this subject including challenging the validity of the will, distribution of the estate, ownership of property, fall outs between, and with, executors and badly drafted wills.

Nick said: “The range of disputes that we cover is endless, but there are certain issues that crop up time and again with this subject.

“A challenge to the validity of the will normally takes the form of an allegation that the will was not correctly signed or witnessed, or that the person making the will did not have the necessary mental capacity to understand what he or she was doing when the will was made.

“Other challenges may argue that improper pressure was brought on the person making the will, normally by a family member or carer, which influenced the person making the will or that the person making the will did not know, and approve of, its contents.

“There can of course be any combination of the above allegations brought in any one case and these can also be accompanied by the allegation of fraud.

“With regards to distribution of the estate, the law gives certain family members and dependents the right to claim for a share of the estate, regardless of whether the deceased left a will or not. Facts in each case must be taken on their own merit and the rules around these challenges are very complicated.

“Cases like these, more often than not, will be motivated by the relevant family member feeling that he or she has been treated unfairly by the deceased when another beneficiary has received much more.

“For example, a claim might be brought by a child who has been cut out of a parents will or left much less than his or her brother or sister, or a charity or anyone else. We also see many claims from a spouse/partner who feels that the deceased’s will, or lack of one, means that reasonable financial provision has not been made.

“These cases always need careful and experienced handling as there are a number of traps to avoid. Such a claim must be brought within 6 months of the grant of representation to the estate and they also need a certain amount of sensitivity, something which we lawyers are not especially noted for, because they pit family members against each other and thus tend to be quite emotionally charged.

“Property-related arguments also occur quite regularly and can involve any property said to be owned by the deceased. It is not uncommon for a dependent or partner to allege that they put money into the property, directly or indirectly, and argue entitlement to a share of it.

“Disputes also arise between executors about decisions needing to be made. One executor might not agree with what the other wants to do, or it might be that another family member or relative doesn’t agree with what the executors want to do.

“Often those dependents or family members who aren’t involved as executors feel they have a right to know more about what is happening, sometimes taking the view that something unfair has happened.

“Finally, and increasingly nowadays, wills can be drawn up by any non-qualified will writer. We regularly come across wills that are defective in some way which affects their validity or wills that have been very badly drafted meaning they are vague or that the wishes of the person that made the will may have not been properly recorded. It is always worth considering a claim against the person that drafted the will in such circumstances.

“Dealing with the administration of an estate can be stressful. We always look for the most practical and beneficial solution to clients’ concerns.

“If you think that you may have a situation that falls into this area or with which we can assist, please contact us today. It is important to seek specialist legal advice as soon as possible.”

For further advice on this type of dispute contact Nick Lambert, litigation solicitor at Wake Smith on 0114 266 6660 or at [email protected]

Tags

Archive

November 20242October 20246September 20245August 20245July 20243June 20243May 20245April 20242March 20247February 20242January 20248December 20236November 20232October 20233September 20232August 20234July 20232June 20235May 20237March 20234February 20235January 20233December 20225November 20224October 20224September 20223June 20221May 20227April 20223March 20223February 20223January 20224December 20214November 20213October 20214September 20216August 20212July 202111June 20218May 20216April 20212March 20218February 20218January 20219December 20208November 202013October 20208September 20208August 20203July 20208June 202016May 202011April 20206March 202016February 20208January 202011December 20199November 20199October 201911September 20195August 20194July 20196May 20198April 20196March 20193February 20195January 20194December 20186November 20185October 20182September 20185August 20184July 20189June 20184May 201810April 20185March 20184February 20184January 20183December 20175November 20178October 20177September 20179August 20175July 20176June 201710May 20175April 20178March 201711February 20176January 201710December 20169November 20167October 201610September 201610August 20166July 20167June 20163May 20162April 20166March 20162February 20164January 20165December 20153November 20155October 20156September 20156August 20157July 20157June 20157May 20156April 20159March 20156February 201510January 20156December 20145November 20144October 20142September 20143May 20144March 20146February 20144January 20142December 20132November 20133September 20134July 20132June 20132May 20133April 20131March 20133February 20133January 20136December 20121November 20123October 20122August 20122July 20128June 20123April 20123March 20121January 20124December 20112November 20111October 20112September 20113August 20113July 20117June 20119May 20117April 20115March 20119February 20118January 20111December 20101October 20102September 20102August 20103July 20106June 20101May 20102April 20106March 20102February 20103January 20102December 20095November 20092October 20092September 20092August 20091July 20095June 20095May 20093April 20093March 20093February 20091January 20092November 20082October 20082September 20081August 20083July 20081January 20082

Featured Articles

Contact us