Mark Serby, director at Wake Smith Solicitors and employment lawyer asks: “How fair is the Gig Economy…?”

Wake Smith Solicitors 05 June 2017

The gig economy is so called because those engaged in it work on the flexible basis of 'one gig at a time' to create a labour market which is characterised by short-term contracts or freelance work, as opposed to permanent jobs. 

It is estimated that five million people in the UK work in the gig economy, typically in industries such as food and goods delivery and taxi driving. Companies who deliver their services in this way include Uber, Deliveroo, Hermes, Pimlico Plumbers and City Sprint. 

According to figures produced by the companies which operate in this way, many people like the flexibility offered by this type of work. Deliveroo claims that 85 per cent of their workers take the work on as a second job and work on average of 15 hours a week for them. Uber says that 94 per cent of its staff like working their own hours so that they can prioritise their lives around their work.

From the company’s perspective it helps to keep costs down as they don’t pay when the work is not there. Typically a worker will log on to a website operated by the company and then accept work and tasks during the time that they are logged on.

It is not all plain sailing, however, the gig economy has problems and detractors and is being scrutinised by the Law Courts, so how fair is it?

People working in the gig economy are treated as independent contractors, and as such, are not entitled to the minimum wage (although most companies claim that they pay this), protection from unfair dismissal, redundancy, nor do they receive paid holiday or sickness pay.

HMRC is also anxious about the sector because it does not make collections through PAYE and neither the workers or the gig economy companies pay any NI contributions.

Increasingly people working in this sector are bringing claims to seek a ruling that they are employees and are therefore entitled to many of the protections affordable to full time employees.

Uber has been told by the Employment Tribunal that its drivers are in fact workers. The Tribunal rejected Uber’s argument that the drivers were working directly for the customers and that the Uber App merely facilitated that work or provided a platform for drivers to contract with customers.

The Tribunal rated that Uber:

  • Could amend drivers’ terms unilaterally.
  • Required drivers to accept and not cancel trips.
  • Imposed numerous conditions controlling how drivers did their work.
  • Subjected drivers to a rating system, which is effectively a performance management and disciplinary procedure.
  • Should repay all losses, rather than 'self-employed' drivers bearing those losses.

City Sprint has also been told that one of its cycle couriers is a worker and there are similar claims pending against Excel, Addison Lee and e-Courier. A Tribunal found that the City Sprint courier was integrated into the business as a worker during the periods that she was logged into the company’s GPS system.

Deliveroo is facing a claim by courier riders who also seek an order that they are workers and should therefore be afforded basic protections.

Pimlico Plumbers lost its case in the Court of Appeal which found that a plumber was a worker and an employee for discrimination purposes. The plumber was required to perform the work personally and the degree of control exercised by Pimlico Plumbers and the integration of the worker within Pimlico Plumbers were consistent with Pimlico Plumbers being a customer or client of the business run by Mr Smith.

It is too early to say whether these recent Tribunal decisions represent a threat to the gig economy’s business model. We will have to wait and see whether companies in this sector are forced to make changes to their working practices, either to accept that their operatives are workers, or to make changes to their working arrangements to bolster the argument for self-employment.

The Taylor review, led by Matthew Taylor, is an independent review of employment practices. It will consider the implications of new models of working on the rights and responsibilities of workers, as well as on employer freedoms and obligations.

For more information on employment contact Mark Serby at [email protected]

Tags

Archive

December 20245November 20245October 20246September 20245August 20245July 20243June 20243May 20245April 20242March 20247February 20242January 20248December 20236November 20232October 20233September 20232August 20234July 20232June 20235May 20237March 20234February 20235January 20233December 20225November 20224October 20224September 20223June 20221May 20227April 20223March 20223February 20223January 20224December 20214November 20213October 20214September 20216August 20212July 202111June 20218May 20216April 20212March 20218February 20218January 20219December 20208November 202013October 20208September 20208August 20203July 20208June 202016May 202011April 20206March 202016February 20208January 202011December 20199November 20199October 201911September 20195August 20194July 20196May 20198April 20196March 20193February 20195January 20194December 20186November 20185October 20182September 20185August 20184July 20189June 20184May 201810April 20185March 20184February 20184January 20183December 20175November 20178October 20177September 20179August 20175July 20176June 201710May 20175April 20178March 201711February 20176January 201710December 20169November 20167October 201610September 201610August 20166July 20167June 20163May 20162April 20166March 20162February 20164January 20165December 20153November 20155October 20156September 20156August 20157July 20157June 20157May 20156April 20159March 20156February 201510January 20156December 20145November 20144October 20142September 20143May 20144March 20146February 20144January 20142December 20132November 20133September 20134July 20132June 20132May 20133April 20131March 20133February 20133January 20136December 20121November 20123October 20122August 20122July 20128June 20123April 20123March 20121January 20124December 20112November 20111October 20112September 20113August 20113July 20117June 20119May 20117April 20115March 20119February 20118January 20111December 20101October 20102September 20102August 20103July 20106June 20101May 20102April 20106March 20102February 20103January 20102December 20095November 20092October 20092September 20092August 20091July 20095June 20095May 20093April 20093March 20093February 20091January 20092November 20082October 20082September 20081August 20083July 20081January 20082

Featured Articles

Contact us