Raising awareness of Collaborative Law

Wake Smith Solicitors 13 July 2021

Collaborative law is not a new process, but it is not as well known as it should be, despite the numerous benefits it offers.

In the first of a series of four articles over the next two weeks, Deborah Marsh, Associate Family Solicitor and Collaborative Lawyer at Wake Smith Solicitors looks at its advantages for family law clients.

Her first article offers an introduction to collaborative law and its benefits.

Collaborative law process

Collaborative law is one of the many legal options available for those going through the extremely stressful process of separation or divorce/dissolution of their civil partnership or, the equally sensitive process of agreeing the terms of a pre or post nuptial or cohabitation agreement, especially when there are children involved.

During the collaborative process, the parties and their collaborative lawyers all sit around a table working together (known as fourway meetings) to try to find the best possible outcomes for future housing, incomes and arrangements for the children.

The collaborative process allows the parties to set the agenda for these meetings, their priorities and their concerns, and the process moves at their pace – it is not subject to the constraints of a court set timetable.

There can be as many meetings as the parties feel necessary and all discussions take place at these meetings. There are no letters passing between the collaborative lawyers in which their clients’ points get lost in translation.

Before the first meeting, both parties prepare Anchor Statements which set out their concerns, priorities and why they want to use the collaborative process.

All commit to the process so much that they sign a Participation Agreement, a fundamental aspect of which is that if the process breaks down clients must seek alternative legal representation.

Benefits of collaborative law

  • More dignified than the traditional process
  • Control is maintained by the clients rather than handing over to judges
  • Avoids the uncertain outcome of court
  • Ensures a fair outcome for both parties and their children
  • Minimises negative emotional impact on the couple, any children and other family members
  • Offers the best chance of maintaining an amicable relationship
  • Potentially more cost effective – usually shorter with less professional costs and no court costs
  • No court timetable so better pace of discussion
  • Best meets the specific needs of both parties and their children regarding a settlement without the underlying threat of litigation

Deborah’s second article this Thursday will look at how you start the collaborative law process.

To speak to Deborah Marsh about how the collaborative law process can help you, call 0114 266 6660 or email at [email protected] 

Tags

Archive

November 20242October 20246September 20245August 20245July 20243June 20243May 20245April 20242March 20247February 20242January 20248December 20236November 20232October 20233September 20232August 20234July 20232June 20235May 20237March 20234February 20235January 20233December 20225November 20224October 20224September 20223June 20221May 20227April 20223March 20223February 20223January 20224December 20214November 20213October 20214September 20216August 20212July 202111June 20218May 20216April 20212March 20218February 20218January 20219December 20208November 202013October 20208September 20208August 20203July 20208June 202016May 202011April 20206March 202016February 20208January 202011December 20199November 20199October 201911September 20195August 20194July 20196May 20198April 20196March 20193February 20195January 20194December 20186November 20185October 20182September 20185August 20184July 20189June 20184May 201810April 20185March 20184February 20184January 20183December 20175November 20178October 20177September 20179August 20175July 20176June 201710May 20175April 20178March 201711February 20176January 201710December 20169November 20167October 201610September 201610August 20166July 20167June 20163May 20162April 20166March 20162February 20164January 20165December 20153November 20155October 20156September 20156August 20157July 20157June 20157May 20156April 20159March 20156February 201510January 20156December 20145November 20144October 20142September 20143May 20144March 20146February 20144January 20142December 20132November 20133September 20134July 20132June 20132May 20133April 20131March 20133February 20133January 20136December 20121November 20123October 20122August 20122July 20128June 20123April 20123March 20121January 20124December 20112November 20111October 20112September 20113August 20113July 20117June 20119May 20117April 20115March 20119February 20118January 20111December 20101October 20102September 20102August 20103July 20106June 20101May 20102April 20106March 20102February 20103January 20102December 20095November 20092October 20092September 20092August 20091July 20095June 20095May 20093April 20093March 20093February 20091January 20092November 20082October 20082September 20081August 20083July 20081January 20082

Featured Articles

Contact us